Back to Search Start Over

Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer.

Authors :
Peter Schwärzler
Herbert Zech
Margherita Auer
Karin Pfau
Georg Göbel
Pierre Vanderzwalmen
Nicolas Zech
Source :
Human Reproduction; Sep2004, Vol. 19 Issue 9, p2097-2102, 6p
Publication Year :
2004

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrospective cohort study to evaluate differences in outcome when embryo transfer was performed either on day 2–3 (cleavage stage, CS-group) or on day 4–5 (blastocyst stage, BS-group). METHODS: A total of 1259 consecutive cycles yielding 500 live born babies performed at a single centre in Bregenz, Austria, were included. Main outcome measures were implantation and (multiple) pregnancy rates and neonatal outcome including birth defects. RESULTS: Total Pregnancy rate was 44% vs 28% (P<0.001) and the total ‘take home baby rate’ was 37% vs 22% in the BS-group and the CS-group, respectively. Rate of multiple gestations (34% vs 17%, P=0.001) was significantly higher among the BS-group, resulting in a higher rate of preterm deliveries <36 weeks (26% vs 17%, P=0.045). Female factor causing infertility (40% vs 21%, P<0.001) was significantly higher among the BS-group. For the CS-group, rate of singleton pregnancies (83% vs 66%, P=0.001) and idiopathic cause of infertility (34% vs 22%, P=0.012) were significantly higher. No statistically significant differences were found in sex, Caesarean section rate, Apgar score and umbilical artery pH-values, total mean birth weight, admission rate to intensive care unit, days of hospitalization and number of minor and major birth defects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that blastocyst transfer may lead to a higher pregnancy rate with an overall better take-home baby rate (THBR) at the cost of higher rates of multiples and preterm deliveries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02681161
Volume :
19
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Human Reproduction
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20099837
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh398