Back to Search Start Over

Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.

Authors :
Bahlmann, Edda
Gerdts, Eva
Einarsen, Eigir
Midtbø, Helga
Pedersen, Eva R
Rossebø, Anne
Willems, Stephan
Cramariuc, Dana
Source :
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging; Feb2025, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p280-286, 7p
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Aims Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤ 40 mL/m² in men and ≤32 mL/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS [concordantly graded AS by energy loss (CGAS<subscript>EL</subscript>) and discordantly graded AS by energy loss (DGAS<subscript>EL</subscript>)] based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area [energy loss (EL)]. Methods and results Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4 m/s, and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study were used. DGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg and CGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. The outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). CGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> with normal/low flow was present in 57/126 patients. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> irrespective of flow compared to CGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> with normal flow (P < 0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for HF after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement, and aortic valve calcification (P < 0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGAS<subscript>EL</subscript> or CGAS<subscript>EL</subscript>. Conclusion Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00092677. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20472404
Volume :
26
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
182578528
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae272