Back to Search Start Over

Sorafenib or anthracycline‐based chemotherapy for progressive desmoid tumors.

Authors :
Costa, Philippos Apolinario
Arora, Arshia
Fernandez, Yannelys
Yi, Irvin
Bakkila, Baylee
Tan, Heng
Barreto Coelho, Priscila
Campoverde, Leticia
Hardy, Nicole
Bialick, Steven
Espejo Freire, Andrea
D'Amato, Gina Z.
Chang, Yu‐Cherng Channing
Mesenger, Jacob Peter
Subhawong, Ty
Haims, Andrew
Hurwitz, Michael
Olino, Kelly
Turaga, Kiran
Deshpande, Hari
Source :
Cancer (0008543X); Jan2025, Vol. 131 Issue 1, p1-9, 9p
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Background: Desmoid tumors can cause morbidity due to local invasion, potentially being fatal when fast growth compromises vital structures. In this context, a timely treatment response is required. This study aims to compare the activity of sorafenib and anthracycline‐containing regimens during the first year of treatment. Methods: The authors conducted a multi‐institutional retrospective analysis of desmoid tumor patients treated with either sorafenib or an anthracycline‐containing regimen over 1 year. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were time to response (TTR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and adverse events. Results: From 2005 to 2022, 80 patients received sorafenib and 51 received an anthracycline‐containing regimen with similar baseline characteristics. The 1‐year ORR was 37% for anthracycline and 13% for sorafenib (p =.016). Median best response was –9% (range, –73 to 51) for anthracycline and –4% (range, –69 to 126) for sorafenib. Median TTR was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4–7.8) for anthracycline and 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.3–11.1) for sorafenib (p =.2). One‐year PFS was 73% (95% CI, 60–86) for anthracycline and 59% (95% CI, 47–71) for sorafenib (p =.3). Common grade 1–2 adverse events for sorafenib were hand‐foot syndrome (40%), diarrhea (25%), and fatigue (22%); for anthracycline, they were nausea (31%), fatigue (16%), and rash (14%). Grade 3 events were higher in the anthracycline group, 27% versus 14% (p <.05). Conclusion: Anthracycline‐based therapy provided a greater 1‐year response rate than sorafenib but was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events. Higher‐risk desmoid tumors, which need a more timely response, might benefit from anthracycline‐based therapies, whereas average‐risk tumors could benefit from sorafenib. This article reports a multi‐institutional retrospective comparison of the activity between sorafenib and anthracycline‐based chemotherapies for desmoid tumors. It shows that anthracycline‐based chemotherapies can produce a greater proportion of responses in the first year of treatment at the expense of greater toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
131
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancer (0008543X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
182079318
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35647