Back to Search Start Over

Machine Learning Models in Sepsis Outcome Prediction for ICU Patients: Integrating Routine Laboratory Tests—A Systematic Review.

Authors :
Mușat, Florentina
Păduraru, Dan Nicolae
Bolocan, Alexandra
Palcău, Cosmin Alexandru
Copăceanu, Andreea-Maria
Ion, Daniel
Jinga, Viorel
Andronic, Octavian
Source :
Biomedicines; Dec2024, Vol. 12 Issue 12, p2892, 26p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background. Sepsis presents significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges, and traditional scoring systems, such as SOFA and APACHE, show limitations in predictive accuracy. Machine learning (ML)-based predictive survival models can support risk assessment and treatment decision-making in the intensive care unit (ICU) by accounting for the numerous and complex factors that influence the outcome in the septic patient. Methods. A systematic literature review of studies published from 2014 to 2024 was conducted using the PubMed database. Eligible studies investigated the development of ML models incorporating commonly available laboratory and clinical data for predicting survival outcomes in adult ICU patients with sepsis. Study selection followed the PRISMA guidelines and relied on predefined inclusion criteria. All records were independently assessed by two reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third senior reviewer. Data related to study design, methodology, results, and interpretation of the results were extracted in a predefined grid. Results. Overall, 19 studies were identified, encompassing primarily logistic regression, random forests, and neural networks. Most used datasets were US-based (MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU-CRD). The most common variables used in model development were age, albumin levels, lactate levels, and ventilator. ML models demonstrated superior performance metrics compared to conventional methods and traditional scoring systems. The best-performing model was a gradient boosting decision tree, with an area under curve of 0.992, an accuracy of 0.954, and a sensitivity of 0.917. However, several critical limitations should be carefully considered when interpreting the results, such as population selection bias (i.e., single center studies), small sample sizes, limited external validation, and model interpretability. Conclusions. Through real-time integration of routine laboratory and clinical data, ML-based tools can assist clinical decision-making and enhance the consistency and quality of sepsis management across various healthcare contexts, including ICUs with limited resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22279059
Volume :
12
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Biomedicines
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181955588
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122892