Venous sinus stenting versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting: comparing clinical outcomes for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Background Venous sinus stenting (VSS) has been shown to reduce intracranial venous pressures and improve symptoms in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). However, long-term follow-up data are limited, raising concerns about sustained symptom improvement. We aimed to assess long-term outcomes of VSS compared with ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Methods A retrospective case-control study assessed 87 patients with IIH who met inclusion criteria and underwent either VSS (n=27) or VPS (n=60) between 2017 and 2022. Descriptive statistics for baseline characteristics and outcomes were calculated, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with headache recurrence. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between VSS and VPS groups, including age (p=0.58), sex (p=0.74), body mass index (p=0.47), and preoperative lumbar puncture opening pressure (p=0.62). Preoperative symptoms of headaches (p=0.42), papilledema (p=0.35), and pulsatile tinnitus (p=0.56) were also similar. Initial headache improvement was comparable (96% vs 91%, p=0.42). However, headache recurrence was less common in the VSS group (31% vs 60%, p=0.015) at the last follow-up, averaging over 1 year. Multivariate analysis showed VSS was independently associated with reduced odds of headache recurrence (OR 0.24, p=0.015). Longer follow-up was associated with increased odds of headache recurrence in both groups (OR 1.01, p=0.032). Conclusion VSS was independently associated with reduced odds of headache recurrence compared with VPS in multivariate analysis. Longer follow-up was significantly associated with headache recurrence in both groups. This suggests that VSS may lead to better outcomes for continued headache relief, but headache recurrence may increase with longer follow-up regardless of treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]