Back to Search Start Over

Short QT intervals in African lions.

Authors :
Scharling, Frederik S.
Sandgreen, Ditte‐Mari
Stagegaard, Julia
Elbrønd, Vibeke S.
Vincenti, Stefano
Isaksen, Jonas L.
Wang, Tobias
Wilson, Rory P.
Gunner, Richard
Marks, Nikki
Bell, Stephen H.
van Rooyen, Martin C.
Bennett, Nigel C.
Hart, Daniel W.
Daly, Angela C.
Bertelsen, Mads F.
Scantlebury, D. Michael
Calloe, Kirstine
Thomsen, Morten B.
Source :
Experimental Physiology; Dec2024, Vol. 109 Issue 12, p2088-2099, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The cardiac conduction system in large carnivores, such as the African lion (Panthera leo), represents a significant knowledge gap in both veterinary science and in cardiac electrophysiology. Short QT intervals have been reported from zoo‐kept, anaesthetized lions, and our goal was to record the first ECGs from wild, conscious lions roaming freely, and compare them to zoo‐kept lions under the hypothesis that short QT is unique to zoo‐kept lions. Macroscopic and histological examinations were performed on heart tissue removed from nine healthy zoo lions. ECGs were recorded from the nine anaesthetized zoo‐kept lions, and from 15 anaesthetized and conscious wild lions in Africa. Our histological and topographical description of the lion's heart matched what has previously been published. In conscious lions, the ECG recordings revealed a mean heart rate of 70 ± 4 beats/min, with faster heart rates during the night. PQ and QT intervals were heart rate dependent in the conscious lions. Interestingly, QT intervals recorded in wild lions were markedly longer than QT intervals from zoo lions (398 ± 40 vs. 297 ± 9 ms, respectively; P < 0.0001). Anaesthesia or heart rate did not account for this difference. We provide a comprehensive description of the cardiac anatomy and electrophysiology of wild and zoo‐kept lions. QT intervals were significantly shorter in zoo lions, suggesting functional disparities in cardiac electrophysiology between wild and zoo‐kept lions, potentially related to physical fitness. These findings underscore the plasticity of cardiac electrophysiology and may be of value when reintroducing endangered species into the wild and when managing lions in human care. What is the central question of this study?How do electrocardiograms from zoo lions and free‐roaming wild lions compare?What is the main finding and its importance?QT intervals in zoo lions are shorter compared to wild lions, which may be relevant for our understanding of animals in human care and may influence conservation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09580670
Volume :
109
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Experimental Physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181226015
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092203