МІСЦЕ ТА РОЛЬ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ У СФЕРІ ЗАХИСТУ ПРАВА ІНТЕЛЕКТУАЛЬНОЇ ВЛАСНОСТІ

Studying the institute of intellectual property, we can say that this institute has been developing for a long time and continues its evolution even today. Realizing the importance of intellectual activity and property, humanity began active work on its protection and protection. Currently, the protection of the results of intellectual activity is carried out by a special UN institution and each state separately. Which is quite understandable, because intellectual property is something without which the economy and society in general cannot develop these days. The article emphasizes that administrative responsibility as one of the institutes of the field of administrative law performs a preventive and punitive function and is an important element of state influence to prevent and stop the commission of socially dangerous harmful acts. This indicates that one of the priority directions of the development of the legal state should be considered the improvement of intellectual property rights in terms of administrative and legal protection and protection of intellectual property rights. It has been established that one of the priority directions for the development of the rule of law should be the improvement of intellectual property rights in terms of administrative and legal protection and protection of intellectual property rights. It is about clear and objective regulation of administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property, taking into account adequate measures of administrative and legal responsibility, which in their practical application will prove their effectiveness in countering violations of rights to objects of intellectual property law. It was established that the current legislation, which provides for administrative responsibility for committing offenses in the field of intellectual property, is in a static state, and therefore there are serious legal gaps, in particular at the local and regional levels, which are not filled by the relevant legal norms. It has also been investigated that, as of today, there is no clear plan of measures to counter offenses in the field of intellectual property. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]