Benefit of isolated surgical valve repair or replacement for functional tricuspid regurgitation and long-term outcomes stratified by the TRI-SCORE.

Background and Aims Severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased mortality rates, but benefit of its correction and ideal timing are not clearly determined. This study aimed to identify patient subsets who might benefit from the surgery. Methods In TRIGISTRY, an international cohort study of consecutive patients with severe isolated functional tricuspid regurgitation (33 centres, 10 countries), survival rates up to 10 years were compared between patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (repair or replacement) and those conservatively managed, overall and according to TRI-SCORE category (low: ≤3, intermediate: 4–5, and high: ≥6). Results One thousand and two hundred seventeen were managed conservatively, and 551 underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (200 repairs and 351 replacements). TRI-SCORE distribution was 33% low, 32% intermediate, and 35% high. At 10 years, survival rates were similar between surgical and conservative management [41% vs. 36%; hazard ratio (HR).97; 95% confidence interval (CI).88–1.08, P =.57]. Surgery improved survival compared with conservative management in the low TRI-SCORE category (72% vs. 44%; HR.27; 95% CI.20–.37, P <.0001), but not in the intermediate (36% vs. 37%; HR 1.17; 95%CI.98–1.40, P =.09) or high categories (20% vs. 24%; HR 1.06; 95% CI.91–1.25, P =.45). Both repair and replacement improved survival in the low TRI-SCORE category (84% and 61% vs. 44%; HR.11; 95% CI.06–.19, P <.0001, and HR.65; 95% CI.47–.90, P =.009). Repair showed benefit in the intermediate category (59% vs. 37%; HR.49; 95% CI.35–.68, P <.0001) while replacement was possibly harmful (25% vs. 37%; HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.18–1.72, P =.0002). Conclusions Higher survival rates were observed with repair than replacement and benefit of intervention declined as TRI-SCORE increased with no benefit of any type of surgery in the high TRI-SCORE category. These results emphasize the importance of timely intervention and patient selection to achieve the best outcomes and the need for randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]