Back to Search
Start Over
Assessing pain management in total joint arthroplasty using the Detroit interventional pain assessment scaleāA prospective cohort study.
- Source :
- Arthroplasty; 11/1/2024, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p1-11, 11p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, but postoperative pain has been poorly managed. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess how much narcotic medication was prescribed after TJA; (2) assess if patients were satisfied with their pain management; (3) compare these same data between total hip arthroplasty (THA)/total knee arthroplasty (TKA); (4) compare these same data between preoperative opioid users/opioid-naïve patients. Methods: An IRB-approved prospective study was conducted at a US academic joint replacement practice. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer at three weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively using the Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment (DIPA) scale. Patients verbally rated their pain with their current medication regimen as 0 (no pain), 1 (tolerable pain), or 2 (intolerable pain) on the DIPA scale. Narcotic usage was verified by the Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS). Patients were divided into THA, TKA, previously on opioids, and opioid-naïve groups. Provider efficiency scores reflected pain management satisfaction and were calculated as the percentage of patients reporting no pain or tolerable pain. Results: Out of 200 patients, the percentage of patients using narcotics and their daily usage (MMEs) significantly decreased from 75.5% (27.5 MMEs) at three weeks to 42.9% (5.3 MMEs) at six months (P < 0.001). In 80% of patients, narcotics taken at six months were prescribed by outside providers. Significantly fewer patients used narcotics at six months for THA (15.4%) compared to TKA (52.7%) (P < 0.021). There was a significant difference in daily narcotic usage between patients who took narcotics preoperatively (22.9 MMEs) and opioid-naïve ones (13.4 MMEs) (P < 0.001). Provider efficiency scores were best at three weeks (76.6%) and three months (70%) but declined at six months (57.2%). Conclusions: Narcotic tapering practices were observed as postoperative daily narcotic intake decreased across six months. However, outside providers prescribed 80% of narcotics at six months, necessitating a better-coordinated practice with surgeons. Patients taking preoperative narcotics experienced higher daily MME requirements than their opioid-naïve counterparts. In terms of the percentage of patients on narcotics, THA is a better procedure for tapering patients off narcotics by six months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- THERAPEUTIC use of narcotics
PAIN measurement
TOTAL hip replacement
ACADEMIC medical centers
MORPHINE
T-test (Statistics)
RESEARCH funding
POSTOPERATIVE pain
KRUSKAL-Wallis Test
SURGEONS
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
TERTIARY care
MANN Whitney U Test
LONGITUDINAL method
SURVEYS
PAIN management
OSTEOARTHRITIS
TOTAL knee replacement
OPIOID analgesics
PHYSICIAN practice patterns
PATIENT satisfaction
COMPARATIVE studies
POSTOPERATIVE period
DATA analysis software
CONFIDENCE intervals
PSYCHOSOCIAL factors
TIME
PATIENT aftercare
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Volume :
- 6
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Arthroplasty
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 180628925
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00276-w