Back to Search Start Over

Crustal Thermal Architecture, Structural Reconstructions, Field Relationships, and Geophysical Data Rule Out Deep Structural Burial of the Footwall of the Northern Snake Range Metamorphic Core Complex (Nevada, USA).

Authors :
Long, Sean P.
Blackford, Nolan R.
Lee, Jeffrey
Soignard, Emmanuel
Source :
Tectonics; Oct2024, Vol. 43 Issue 10, p1-48, 48p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Thermobarometry in the Northern Snake Range metamorphic core complex (Nevada, USA) implies pre‐extensional burial of footwall rocks to 21–30 km depths, while geologic field relationships support 7–13 km pre‐extensional depths. This has fueled a 40‐year‐long debate, which has far‐reaching implications for how pressure data are interpreted in orogenic settings. Here, we test published models for deep burial by integrating regional cross‐section reconstructions with new (n = 95) and published (n = 132) peak temperature measurements, field relationships and published geophysical data. Burial of Neoproterozoic‐Cambrian metasedimentary footwall rocks to 21–30 km depths is incompatible with a regional seismic reflection cross‐section that interprets the top of Precambrian crystalline basement at 17–20 km depths. Two reconstructed cross‐sections define 42 km and 50–65 km of displacement on the master detachment fault and demonstrate that the higher displacement ranges (>66–94 km and >76–102 km, respectively) necessary to exhume rocks from 21 to 30 km depths are not possible without spatially overlapping Cambrian rocks preserved in its footwall and hanging wall. The 22°C/km average Late Cretaceous thermal gradient predicted by thermobarometry is incompatible with the 46 ± 10°C/km Late Cretaceous peak thermal gradient that we calculate down to 15–20 km pre‐extensional depths. Field relationships that rule out large‐magnitude shortening invalidate models for deep footwall burial via thrust or reverse faulting. We conclude that there is no scenario for deep burial that is compatible with structural/geophysical constraints, crustal thermal architecture, and field relationships. This necessitates a non‐lithostatic interpretation for pressures from the Northern Snake Range, similar to recent interpretations for other Cordilleran metamorphic core complexes. Key Points: Strain compatibility demonstrates that the detachment displacement necessary to exhume footwall rocks from 21 to 30 km depths is not possibleThe 22°C/km gradient predicted by thermobarometry is incompatible with the Late Cretaceous thermal gradient of 46 ± 10°C/km that we calculateA non‐lithostatic interpretation for pressure data from the Northern Snake Range is required, similar to other Cordilleran core complexes [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02787407
Volume :
43
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Tectonics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180561764
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024TC008368