Cite
Efficiency comparison of extraction methods for the determination of 11 of the 16 USEPA priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water matrices: Sources of origin and ecological risk assessment.
MLA
Ndwabu, Sinayo, et al. “Efficiency Comparison of Extraction Methods for the Determination of 11 of the 16 USEPA Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Matrices: Sources of Origin and Ecological Risk Assessment.” Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, vol. 20, no. 5, Sept. 2024, pp. 1598–610. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4904.
APA
Ndwabu, S., Malungana, M., & Mahlambi, P. (2024). Efficiency comparison of extraction methods for the determination of 11 of the 16 USEPA priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water matrices: Sources of origin and ecological risk assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, 20(5), 1598–1610. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4904
Chicago
Ndwabu, Sinayo, Mncedisi Malungana, and Precious Mahlambi. 2024. “Efficiency Comparison of Extraction Methods for the Determination of 11 of the 16 USEPA Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Matrices: Sources of Origin and Ecological Risk Assessment.” Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management 20 (5): 1598–1610. doi:10.1002/ieam.4904.