Back to Search Start Over

Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology: Quantitative Bias Analysis.

Authors :
Brown, Jeremy P.
Hunnicutt, Jacob N.
Ali, M. Sanni
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Cole, Ashley
Langan, Sinead M.
Nitsch, Dorothea
Rentsch, Christopher T.
Galwey, Nicholas W.
Wing, Kevin
Douglas, Ian J.
Source :
Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety; Oct2024, Vol. 33 Issue 10, p1-11, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Pharmacoepidemiological studies provide important information on the safety and effectiveness of medications, but the validity of study findings can be threatened by residual bias. Ideally, biases would be minimized through appropriate study design and statistical analysis methods. However, residual biases can remain, for example, due to unmeasured confounders, measurement error, or selection into the study. A group of sensitivity analysis methods, termed quantitative bias analyses, are available to assess, quantitatively and transparently, the robustness of study results to these residual biases. These approaches include methods to quantify how the estimated effect would be altered under specified assumptions about the potential bias, and methods to calculate bounds on effect estimates. This article introduces quantitative bias analyses for unmeasured confounding, misclassification, and selection bias, with a focus on their relevance and application to pharmacoepidemiological studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10538569
Volume :
33
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180374592
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70026