Prioritizing Radiation and Targeted Systemic Therapies in Patients with Resected Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer Primaries with Targetable Mutations: A Report from a Multi-Site Single Institution.

Simple Summary: Patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer are often managed by various treatment approaches including surgery, chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and radiation therapy. While patients with a good performance status and a limited burden of disease are often candidates for surgical resection, the selection of the optimal adjuvant treatment paradigm, in light of the development of novel treatments for tumors with actionable mutations, remains a challenge. In this study, we sought to examine the benefit of radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or a combination of treatments following surgery with respect to in-brain progression-free survival and overall survival. Our data demonstrate that a combination of radiation therapy and systemic therapy has a benefit in improving progression-free survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have developed brain metastases. Background/Objectives: Brain metastases (BrMs) are a common complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), present in up to 50% of patients. While the treatment of BrMs requires a multidisciplinary approach with surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and systemic therapy, the advances in molecular sequencing have improved outcomes in patients with targetable mutations. With a push towards the molecular characterization of cancers, we evaluated the outcomes by treatment modality at our institution with respect to prioritizing RT and targeted therapies. Methods: We identified the patients with NSCLC BrMs treated with surgical resection. The primary endpoints were in-brain freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint included index lesion recurrence. The tumor molecular profiles were reviewed. The outcomes were evaluated by treatment modality: surgery followed by adjuvant RT and/or adjuvant systemic therapy. Results: In total, 155/272 (57%) patients who received adjuvant therapy with adequate follow-up were included in this analysis. The patients treated with combination therapy vs. monotherapy had a median FFP time of 10.72 months vs. 5.38 months, respectively (p = 0.072). The patients of Hispanic/Latino vs. non-Hispanic/Latino descent had a statistically significant worse OS of 12.75 months vs. 53.15 months, respectively (p = 0.015). The patients who received multimodality therapy had a trend towards a reduction in index lesion recurrences (χ² test, p = 0.063) with a statistically significant improvement in the patients receiving immunotherapy (χ² test, p = 0.0018). Conclusions: We found that systemic therapy combined with RT may have an increasing role in delaying the time to progression; however, there was no statistically significant relationship between OS and treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]