ВПЛИВ ПОСТМОДЕРНУ НА ФОРМУВАННЯ ТЕНДЕНЦІЙ СУЧАСНОЇ ФІЛОСОФСЬКОЇ АНТРОПОЛОГІЇ.

Modern philosophical anthropology needs a revision of research problems. This is related to changes in social reality, as well as those trends that have formed in postmodern philosophy. The purpose and objectives of the article are to identify the postmodern influence on the development of certain trends in philosophical anthropology and to justify the need to search for new tools and methods for understanding the human. After all, the new paradigm is not just a hypothetical phenomenon, but rather a statement of a gradually evolving process that acquires new characteristics. Thus, since the formation of the philosophical concept of Postmodernism, we have seen that various directions of philosophy, including philosophical anthropology, are moving away from expansive and universalized systems, and turning to individual questions, problems, etc. Also, during the last decades, the emphasis in the understanding of the human itself, its possibilities and prospects has shifted somewhat. Therefore, in the article we will address some key moments of Postmodernism, which were turning points for philosophical and anthropological thought. Questioning of a person's integral self, which leads to the formation of a fragmented, multiple and constantly changing identity; the rhizomatic dispersion of man with his nomadic wanderings, which leads to the idea of the global as unifying and disidentifying and distancing at the same time; denial of the idea of universal truth, the objectivity of its constants, and a departure towards a series of constantly changing variabilities, various points of view and experiences, etc.Conclusion. Postmodernists were the first to challenge the traditional notions of the integrity, centeredness, rationality, and autonomy of the subject. In accordance with the contextual historical conditionality, they recognized fragmentation and multiplicity as the only possible ways of perceiving and understanding the deconstructed subject. And although these methods are condemned by critics as leading to relativism, nihilism, and fragmentation of human experience itself. Nevertheless, we should agree that this offers the possibility of liberation from dogma and openness to new perspectives in understanding the human in a complex, constantly changing world. Moreover, in the light of social, technological, or information trends, old approaches may prove to be extremely ineffective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]