Back to Search Start Over

Unveiling critical structural features for effective HDAC8 inhibition: a comprehensive study using quantitative read-across structure–activity relationship (q-RASAR) and pharmacophore modeling.

Authors :
Khatun, Samima
Dasgupta, Indrasis
Islam, Rakibul
Amin, Sk. Abdul
Jha, Tarun
Dhaked, Devendra Kumar
Gayen, Shovanlal
Source :
Molecular Diversity; Aug2024, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p2197-2215, 19p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Histone deacetylases constitute a group of enzymes that participate in several biological processes. Notably, inhibiting HDAC8 has become a therapeutic strategy for various diseases. The current inhibitors for HDAC8 lack selectivity and target multiple HDACs. Consequently, there is a growing recognition of the need for selective HDAC8 inhibitors to enhance the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. In our current study, we have utilized a multi-faceted approach, including Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) combined with Quantitative Read-Across Structure–Activity Relationship (q-RASAR) modeling, pharmacophore mapping, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The developed q-RASAR model has a high statistical significance and predictive ability (Q<superscript>2</superscript><subscript>F1</subscript>:0.778, Q<superscript>2</superscript><subscript>F2</subscript>:0.775). The contributions of important descriptors are discussed in detail to gain insight into the crucial structural features in HDAC8 inhibition. The best pharmacophore hypothesis exhibits a high regression coefficient (0.969) and a low root mean square deviation (0.944), highlighting the importance of correctly orienting hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA), ring aromatic (RA), and zinc-binding group (ZBG) features in designing potent HDAC8 inhibitors. To confirm the results of q-RASAR and pharmacophore mapping, molecular docking analysis of the five potent compounds (44, 54, 82, 102, and 118) was performed to gain further insights into these structural features crucial for interaction with the HDAC8 enzyme. Lastly, MD simulation studies of the most active compound (54, mapped correctly with the pharmacophore hypothesis) and the least active compound (34, mapped poorly with the pharmacophore hypothesis) were carried out to validate the observations of the studies above. This study not only refines our understanding of essential structural features for HDAC8 inhibition but also provides a robust framework for the rational design of novel selective HDAC8 inhibitors which may offer insights to medicinal chemists and researchers engaged in the development of HDAC8-targeted therapeutics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13811991
Volume :
28
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Molecular Diversity
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180105203
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-024-10903-y