Back to Search Start Over

Disability trajectories by progression independent of relapse activity status differ in pediatric, adult and late-onset multiple sclerosis.

Authors :
Simone, Marta
Lucisano, Giuseppe
Guerra, Tommaso
Paolicelli, Damiano
Rocca, Maria A.
Brescia Morra, Vincenzo
Patti, Francesco
Annovazzi, Pietro
Gasperini, Claudio
De Luca, Giovanna
Ferraro, Diana
Margari, Lucia
Granella, Franco
Pozzilli, Carlo
Romano, Silvia
Perini, Paola
Bergamaschi, Roberto
Coniglio, Maria Gabriella
Lus, Giacomo
Vianello, Marika
Source :
Journal of Neurology; Oct2024, Vol. 271 Issue 10, p6782-6790, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: To compare Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) trajectories over time between Multiple Sclerosis (MS) groups with pediatric (POMS), adult (AOMS) and late (LOMS) onset, and between patients with and without progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Methods: Patients with a first visit within 1 year from onset, ≥ 5-year follow-up and ≥ 1 visit every 6 months were selected from the Italian MS Register. Adjusted disability trajectories were assessed by longitudinal models for repeated measures. Comparisons between groups and between patients with and without PIRA in subgroups were performed by evaluating the yearly differences of mean EDSS score changes versus baseline (delta-EDSS). A first CDA event was defined as a 6-months confirmed disability increase from study baseline, measured by EDSS (increase ≥ 1.5 points with baseline EDSS = 0; ≥ 1.0 with baseline EDSS score ≤ 5.0 and ≥ 0.5 point with baseline EDSS > 5.5). PIRA was defined as a CDA event occurring more than 90 days after and more than 30 days before the onset of a relapse. Results: 3777 MS patients (268 POMS, 3282 AOMS, 227 LOMS) were included. The slope of disability trajectories significantly diverged in AOMS vs POMS starting from the second year of follow-up (Year 2: delta2-EDSS 0.18 (0.05; 0.31), p = 0.0054) and then mean delta2-EDSS gradually increased up to 0.23 (0.07; 0.39, p = 0.004) at year 5. Patients with PIRA had significant (p < 0.0001) steeper increase in EDSS scores than those without PIRA in all groups, although in POMS, the disability trajectories began to diverge later and at a lesser extent with delta-EDSS score of 0.48 vs 0.83 in AOMS and 1.57 in LOMS, at 3 years after the first PIRA. Conclusions: Age is relevant in determining disability progression in MS. POMS shows a less steep increase in EDSS scores over time than older patients. The effect of PIRA in accelerating EDSS progression is less pronounced in POMS than in AOMS and LOMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03405354
Volume :
271
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180036610
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12638-0