Back to Search Start Over

A Comparison of the Cecal Microbiota between the Infection and Recovery Periods in Chickens with Different Susceptibilities to Eimeria tenella.

Authors :
Tang, Jianqiang
Wang, Qi
Yu, Hailiang
Dong, Liyue
Tang, Meihui
Arif, Areej
Zhang, Genxi
Zhang, Tao
Xie, Kaizhou
Su, Shijie
Zhao, Zhenhua
Dai, Guojun
Source :
Animals (2076-2615); Sep2024, Vol. 14 Issue 18, p2709, 19p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Simple Summary: Coccidiosis is an intestinal parasitic disease caused by Eimeria protozoa, which endangers the health and growth of animals. However, little is known about the intestinal resident microbiota of chickens with different resistance to Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) infection and the changes in the microbiota from infection to recovery periods. The metagenomic sequencing analyses show that many potential differential microbial taxa were identified in different resistant chickens, respectively. Through the comparative analysis from infection to recovery periods, the number of microorganisms with the same trend of change between the control and resistant groups was greater than that between the control and susceptible groups. These findings provide a reference for further research into how E. tenella infection affects the intestinal microbiota and thus the growth, development, and health of chickens. To investigate the effect of Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) infection on the cecal microbiota, resistant and susceptible families were screened out based on the coccidiosis resistance evaluation indexes after E. tenella infection. Subsequently, a comparative analysis of cecal microorganisms among control, resistant, and susceptible groups as well as between different periods following the E. tenella challenge was conducted using metagenomic sequencing technology. The results showed that the abundance of opportunistic pathogens, such as Pantoea, Sporomusa, and Pasteurella in the susceptible group and Helicobacter and Sutterella in the resistant group, was significantly higher on day 27 post-inoculation (PI) (the recovery period) than on day 5 PI (the infection period). Additionally, the abundance of Alistipes, Butyricicoccus, and Eubacterium in the susceptible group and Coprococcus, Roseburia, Butyricicoccus, and Lactobacillus in the resistant group showed a significant upward trend during the infection period compared with that in the recovery period. On day 5 PI, the abundance of Faecalibacterium and Lactobacillus was decreased in both the resistant and susceptible groups when compared with that in the control group and was greater in the resistant group than in the susceptible group, while Alistipes in the susceptible group had a relatively higher abundance than that in other groups. A total of 49 biomarker taxa were identified using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) method. Of these, the relative abundance of Lactobacillus aviarius, Lactobacillus salivarius, Roseburia, and Ruminococcus gauvreauii was increased in the resistant group, while Bacteroides _AGMB03916, Fusobacterium_mortiferum, Alistipes _An31A, and Alistipes _Marseille_P5061 were enriched in the susceptible group. On day 27 PI, LDA scores identified 43 biomarkers, among which the relative abundance of Elusimicrobium _An273 and Desulfovibrio _An276 was increased in the resistant group, while that of Bacteroides _43_108, Chlamydiia, Chlamydiales, and Sutterella _AM11 39 was augmented in the susceptible group. Our results indicated that E. tenella infection affects the structure of the cecal microbiota during both the challenge and recovery periods. These findings will enhance the understanding of the effects of changes in the cecal microbiota on chickens after coccidia infection and provide a reference for further research on the mechanisms underlying how the intestinal microbiota influence the growth and health of chickens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20762615
Volume :
14
Issue :
18
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Animals (2076-2615)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180020949
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182709