Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Externally Transferred and Self-Recruited Patients with Hip and Knee Revision Arthroplasty at a Certified Maximum-Care Arthroplasty Center (ACmax).
- Source :
- Healthcare (2227-9032); Sep2024, Vol. 12 Issue 18, p1869, 13p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background/Objectives: According to the guidelines of the EndoCert initiative, certified maximum-care arthroplasty centers (ACmax) are obliged to admit patients from certified arthroplasty centers (AC) if these patients need to be transferred to the more specialized ACmax due to difficult replacement and revision procedures as well as after complications in primary care that are beyond the expertise of the smaller centers. This study investigated whether the cohort of transferred patients differed from the patients directly recruited at the ACmax for factors such as severity of diagnosis, comorbidities or outcome. The aim was to determine whether transferred patients increased the resource requirements for the ACmax. Methods: A total of 136 patients were included in the retrospective study and analyzed in terms of case severity, length of hospital stays (LOS), Diagnosis-Related Group charges, readmission rate and concomitant diseases. All patients were followed for up to 12 months after the initial hospital stay. Results: There were significant differences between the groups of transferred and self-recruited patients. For example, transferred patients had a higher Patient Clinical Complexity Level (PCCL). Similarly, the increased Case Mix Index (CMI) of transferred patients indicated more intensive care during the inpatient stay. The higher values for the comorbidity indices also supported these results. This had an impact on the LOS and overall costs, too. The differences between the groups were also reflected by adverse events during the one-year follow-up. The higher percentage of patients with septic revisions, whose treatment is especially demanding, among transferred patients aggravated the differences even further. Thus, transferred patients were associated with increased resource requirements for the ACmax. Conclusions: While it serves patients' safety to transfer them to an ACmax with specialized expertise and greater structural quality, the care of transferred patients ties up considerable resources at the ACmax that might only be insufficiently reimbursed by the generalized tariffs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- MEDICAL care use
DIAGNOSIS related groups
TOTAL hip replacement
PATIENTS
HEALTH insurance reimbursement
PROSTHESIS-related infections
T-test (Statistics)
HOSPITAL admission & discharge
PRIMARY health care
PATIENT readmissions
QUESTIONNAIRES
FISHER exact test
SEVERITY of illness index
EVALUATION of medical care
RETROSPECTIVE studies
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
MANN Whitney U Test
ODDS ratio
TOTAL knee replacement
REOPERATION
MEDICAL records
ACQUISITION of data
COMPARATIVE studies
LENGTH of stay in hospitals
ADVERSE health care events
DATA analysis software
COMORBIDITY
MEDICAL care costs
PATIENT aftercare
NOSOLOGY
ECONOMICS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 22279032
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 18
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Healthcare (2227-9032)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 180013702
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181869