Comparative Analysis of Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Nailing Techniques for Tibial Shaft Fractures.

Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures pose a significant challenge in orthopaedic practice, often necessitating surgical intervention for optimal recovery. The selection of the entry point for intramedullary nailing, particularly between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, remains a debated aspect in fracture management. This study aims to compare the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, analyzing surgical techniques, complications, and functional outcomes to inform clinical decision-making. Methodology: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients undergoing intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures, comparing outcomes between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches. Result: Operative time was longer in the infrapatellar group (137.8 minutes) compared to the suprapatellar group (114.4 minutes). The mean radiation dose was higher in the infrapatellar group compared to suprapatellar group. Postoperative outcomes showed a mean Lysholm score of 74 and 90 in the infrapatellar group and suprapatellar group respectively. one case of infection and malunion were reported in the infrapatellar group, while the suprapatellar group had one infection case but no instances of non-union or malunion. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the surgical and clinical outcomes of the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches for tibial shaft fractures. Among both techniques the suprapatellar approach may offer advantages in terms of operative efficiency and functional recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]