Back to Search Start Over

Family communication of cancer genetic test results in an ethnically diverse population: a qualitative exploration of more than 200 patients.

Authors :
Hodan, Rachel
Picus, Miles
Stanclift, Caroline
Ormond, Kelly E.
Pichardo, Jennifer Morales
Kurian., Allison W.
Ricker, Charité
Idos, Gregory E.
Source :
Journal of Community Genetics; Aug2024, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p363-374, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Previous research on family communication of cancer genetic test results has primarily focused on non-Hispanic White patients with high-risk pathogenic variants (PV). There are limited data on patient communication of moderate-risk PVs, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and negative results. This qualitative study examined communication of positive, negative, and VUS hereditary cancer multi-gene panel (MGP) results in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population. As part of a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 2000 patients who underwent MGP testing at three hospitals in California, USA, free-text written survey responses to the question: "Feel free to share any thoughts or experiences with discussing genetic test results with others" were collected from participant questionnaires administered at 3 and 12-months post results disclosure. Content and thematic analyses were performed using a theory-driven analysis, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), on 256 responses from 214 respondents. Respondents with high perceived utility of sharing genetic test results often reported positive attitudes towards sharing test results and direct encouragement for genetic testing of others. Respondents with high self-efficacy in the sharing process were likely to report high perceived utility of sharing, whereas patients with low self-efficacy more often had VUS results and were more likely to report uncertainty about sharing. Consistent with TPB, our findings suggest that clinician reinforcement of the utility of genetic testing may increase intent for patients to communicate genetic information. Our findings suggest that clinicians should focus on strategies to improve patient understanding of VUS results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1868310X
Volume :
15
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Community Genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179711076
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-024-00712-z