Back to Search Start Over

Usefulness and safety of new ultrasmall-diameter colonoscope for cases with difficult insertion: a retrospective study.

Authors :
Terada, Rie
Ichijima, Ryoji
Iwao, Aya
Kinebuchi, Hiroshi
Okada, Yuta
Sugita, Tomomi
Ogura, Kanako
Haruta, Akiko
Kogure, Hirofumi
Source :
Scientific Reports; 9/14/2024, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-6, 6p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Colonoscopies are widely available, but there are cases where insertion can be difficult, even for experienced endoscopists. EC-760XP/L, a new ultrasmall-diameter long scope, may be useful in such cases. This single-center retrospective study included 39 cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult even when previously conducted by an experienced endoscopist. The primary outcome was the cecal intubation time using EC-760XP/L compared to the time used in a previous examination with a standard scope. The secondary outcomes were the cecum intubation rate, intestinal cleanliness level, adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, sedative use rate, occurrence of adverse events, and pain experience. A comparison of cecal intubation times between EC-760XP/L and the standard scope showed that insertion times were significantly lower with EC-760XP/L (9.5 min) compared to the standard scope (19 min) (p < 0.01). The standard scope achieved cecal intubation in 30 cases (76.9%), whereas EC-760XP/L reached the cecum in all cases (p < 0.01). Pain was observed in 3 cases (8.3%) with the EC-760XP/L, which was significantly lower than the 22 cases (56.4%) with the standard scope (p < 0.01). In conclusion, EC-760XP/L proved to be useful in cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20452322
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Scientific Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179669875
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72689-1