Evaluating the Performance of Pulsed and Continuous-Wave Lidar Wind Profilers with a Controlled Motion Experiment.

While floating wind lidars provide reliable and cost-effective measurements, these measurements may be inaccurate due to the motion of the installation platforms. Prior studies have not distinguished between systematic errors associated with lidars and errors resulting from motion. This study will fill this gap by examining the impact of platform motion on two types of profiling wind lidar systems: the pulsed WindCube V1 (Leosphere) and the continuous-wave ZephIR 300 (Natural Power). On a moving hexapod platform, both systems were subjected to 50 controlled sinusoidal motion cases in different degrees of freedom. Two reference lidars were placed at a distance of five meters from the platform as reference lidars. Motion-induced errors in mean wind speed and turbulence intensity estimation by lidars are analyzed. Additionally, the effectiveness of a motion correction approach in reducing these errors across various scenarios is evaluated. The results indicate that presence of rotational motion leads to higher turbulence intensity (TI) estimation by moving lidars. The absolute percentage error between lidars is the highest when lidars are exposed to yaw and heave motion and is the lowest when exposed to surge motion. The correlation between lidars, though it is the lowest in the presence of pitch, yaw, and heave motion. Furthermore, applying motion compensation can compensate the correlation drop and erroneous TI estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]