Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness Assessment of Bispectral Index Monitoring Compared with Conventional Monitoring in General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.

Authors :
Gu, Yichun
Hao, Jiajun
Wang, Jiangna
Liang, Peng
Peng, Xinyi
Qin, Xiaoxiao
Zhang, Yunwei
He, Da
Monaco, Fabrizio
Source :
Anesthesiology Research & Practice; 8/7/2024, Vol. 2024, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Objective. The Bispectral Index (BIS) is utilized to guide the depth of anesthesia monitoring during surgical procedures. However, conflicting results regarding the benefits of BIS for depth of anesthesia monitoring have been reported in numerous studies. The purpose of this meta‐analysis and systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of BIS for depth of anesthesia monitoring. Search Methods. A systematic search of Ovid‐MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed was conducted from inception to April 20, 2023. Clinical trial registers and grey literature were also searched, and reference lists of included studies, as well as related review articles, were manually reviewed. Selection Criteria. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials without gender or age restrictions. The control groups used conventional monitoring, while the intervention groups utilized BIS monitoring. The exclusion criteria included duplicates, reviews, animal studies, unclear outcomes, and incomplete data. Data Collection and Analysis. Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality, with analyses conducted using R 4.0 software. Main Results. Forty studies were included. In comparison to the conventional depth of anesthesia monitoring, BIS monitoring reduced the postoperative cognitive dysfunction risk (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73∼0.99, P = 0.04), shortened the eye‐opening time (MD = −1.34, 95% CI: −2.06∼−0.61, P < 0.01), orientation recovery time (MD = −1.99, 95% CI: −3.62∼−0.36, P = 0.02), extubation time (MD = −2.54, 95% CI: −3.50∼−1.58, P < 0.01), and postanesthesia care unit stay time (MD = −7.11, 95% CI: −12.67∼−1.55, P = 0.01) and lowered the anesthesia drug dosage (SMD = −0.39, 95% CI: −0.63∼−0.15, P < 0.01).​ Conclusion. BIS can be used to effectively monitor the depth of anesthesia. Its use in general anesthesia enhances the effectiveness of both patient care and surgical procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16876962
Volume :
2024
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Anesthesiology Research & Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179482143
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5555481