Back to Search
Start Over
Pressurized Regenerative Calcium Cycle for Utility-Scale Energy Storage: A Techno-Economic Assessment.
- Source :
- Processes; Aug2024, Vol. 12 Issue 8, p1778, 31p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- The University of Newcastle (UON) and Jord International Pty Ltd. (Jord) have jointly developed a novel concept for the storage of energy from renewable and fossil fuel sources. The process, referred to as the pressurized regenerative calcium cycle (PRC<superscript>2</superscript>), relies on cyclic carbonation and calcination of CaO/CaCO<subscript>3</subscript>, in which low-cost electrical energy (i.e., off-peak, or excess generation from renewables) drives the calcination reaction and electricity is generated as required through the carbonation reaction. Initial proof-of-concept testing of the process was previously conducted within an existing fluid bed reactor at UON. The PRC<superscript>2</superscript> concept was successfully demonstrated by maintaining the fluid bed reactor at a constant temperature by using the heat released during the reaction of calcium oxide and carbon dioxide. Following proof-of-concept testing, further refinement of the PRC<superscript>2</superscript> process, which is the subject of this paper, was conducted to address its shortcomings and, importantly, facilitate the detailed design, construction, and operation of a large-scale demonstration plant. Nine different configurations were examined for the PRC<superscript>2</superscript> process, for each of which a combined experimental, process modelling, and techno-economic assessment was completed. Experimental investigations were conducted to determine the suitability of carbonate materials for the PRC<superscript>2</superscript> process. Process modelling and levelized cost of storage (LCOS) calculations were concurrently conducted and revealed that the molten salt approach (Option 9) was the most promising, having superior round-trip efficiency and lowest LCOS. For practical reasons (e.g., technical difficulties of working with molten salts), Option 3 (indirect power generation using a fluid bed reactor) was deemed the most feasible option for a demonstration scale plant. The LCOS for Option 3 (assuming a 100 MWe capacity) was calculated to be AUD 245 per MWh, which is on par with the cost of batteries for peak power replacement applications (the cost associated with lithium-ion batteries is AUD 370 per MWh). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 22279717
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Processes
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 179379447
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12081778