Back to Search Start Over

Microwave-assisted synthesis of 2,5-dioxo-pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline-3-carboxylates and their investigation as antiproliferative agents targeting EGFR and/or BRAFV600E.

Authors :
Aly, Ashraf A.
El-Naby, Hisham A. Abd
Ahmed, Essam Kh.
Shaker, Raafat M.
Gedamy, Sageda A.
Youssif, Bahaa G. M.
Gomaa, Hesham A. M.
Fuhr, Olaf
Brown, Alan B.
Ibrahim, Mahmoud A. A.
El-Haleem, Lamiaa E. Abd
Source :
Chemical Papers; Aug2024, Vol. 78 Issue 12, p7187-7199, 13p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline-3-carboxylate derivatives 3a-j were synthesized efficiently by the microwave–irradiated condensation of 4-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,2-dihydroquinoline-3-carbaldehydes 4a-j with ethyl cyanoacetate (2) in the presence of ethanol and a catalytic amount of piperidine. The structures of the products were confirmed by a combination of spectral techniques including infra-red (IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mass spectrometry (MS) and elemental analyses in addition to X-ray structure analysis. The synthesized compounds 3a-j were tested for their in vitro antiproliferative activity against four human cancer cell lines using the MTT assay and doxorubicin as the reference drug: pancreas (Panc-1) cancer cell line, breast cancer (MCF-7) cell line, colon cancer (HT-29) cell line, and epithelial cancer (A-549) cell line. In comparison to the standard doxorubicin (GI<subscript>50 </subscript>= 1.10 µM), compounds 3a-j demonstrated promising antiproliferative action, with GI<subscript>50</subscript> values ranging from 1.30 to 5.90 µM. The most effective derivatives were compounds 3c, 3g, 3h, and 3i with GI<subscript>50</subscript> values ranging from 1.30 to 2.20 µM. The most potent antiproliferative derivative, compound 3c (R<superscript>1 </superscript>= OCH<subscript>3</subscript>, R<superscript>2 </superscript>= R<superscript>3 </superscript>= H), was also the most potent EGFR inhibitor, with an IC<subscript>50</subscript> value of 105 ± 08 nM, 1.3-fold less potent than erlotinib (IC<subscript>50</subscript> = 80 ± 05 nM). Compounds 3g (R<superscript>1 </superscript>= Br, R<superscript>2 </superscript>= R<superscript>3 </superscript>= H) and 3h (R<superscript>1 </superscript>= Cl, R<superscript>2 </superscript>= R<superscript>3 </superscript>= H) were the second and third most active, with IC<subscript>50</subscript> values of 124 ± 10 nM and 195 ± 13 nM, respectively. Molecular docking calculations were conducted to inspect the docking scores and poses of the most promising compounds against EGFR and BRAF<superscript>V600E</superscript>. Based on the docking computations, compounds 3c and 3g revealed promising docking scores against the EGFR and BRAF<superscript>V600E</superscript> with values of − 7.9 and − 8.3 kcal/mol, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03666352
Volume :
78
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Chemical Papers
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179357170
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-024-03599-9