Back to Search Start Over

A 30 m Global Flood Inundation Model for Any Climate Scenario.

Authors :
Wing, Oliver E. J.
Bates, Paul D.
Quinn, Niall D.
Savage, James T. S.
Uhe, Peter F.
Cooper, Anthony
Collings, Thomas P.
Addor, Nans
Lord, Natalie S.
Hatchard, Simbi
Hoch, Jannis M.
Bates, Joe
Probyn, Izzy
Himsworth, Sam
Rodríguez González, Josué
Brine, Malcolm P.
Wilkinson, Hamish
Sampson, Christopher C.
Smith, Andrew M.
Neal, Jeffrey C.
Source :
Water Resources Research; Aug2024, Vol. 60 Issue 8, p1-32, 32p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Global flood mapping has developed rapidly over the past decade, but previous approaches have limited scope, function, and accuracy. These limitations restrict the applicability and fundamental science questions that can be answered with existing model frameworks. Harnessing recently available data and modeling methods, this paper presents a new global ∼30 m resolution Global Flood Map (GFM) with complete coverage of fluvial, pluvial, and coastal perils, for any return period or climate scenario, including accounting for uncertainty. With an extensive compilation of global benchmark case studies—ranging from locally collected event water levels, to national inventories of engineering flood maps—we execute a comprehensive validation of the new GFM. For flood extent comparisons, we demonstrate that the GFM achieves a critical success index of ∼0.75. In the more discriminatory tests of flood water levels, the GFM deviates from observations by ∼0.6 m on average. Results indicating this level of global model fidelity are unprecedented in the literature. With an optimistic scenario of future warming (SSP1‐2.6), we show end‐of‐century global flood hazard (average annual inundation volume) increases are limited to 9% (likely range ‐6%–29%); this is within the likely climatological uncertainty of −8%–12% in the current hazard estimate. In contrast, pessimistic scenario (SSP5‐8.5) hazard changes emerge from the background noise in the 2040s, rising to a 49% (likely range of 7%–109%) increase by 2100. This work verifies the fitness‐for‐purpose of this new‐generation GFM for impact analyses with a variety of beneficial applications across policymaking, planning, and commercial risk assessment. Plain Language Summary: Computer models use a variety of data and physical equations to estimate the extent and depth of possible flood events. Global applications of these tools have been developed over the past decade, but they are not very good at simulating the behavior of real floods. In this paper, we address some key problems to make a global model that does a lot better than past ones. We apply new techniques to better understand how much water we need to put into the model for a given flood probability. This movement of water is simulated by the model over a more accurate map of the Earth's terrain than has been available previously, with river channels represented in a smarter way. We look at the projected changes in rainfall, river discharge, and sea levels for given levels of warming simulated by available climate models and adjust the probabilities of a given magnitude flood accordingly. The model results suggest that the effect of future climate change might be small relative to our ability to understand flood hazards today, but this depends heavily on how much carbon we emit in the coming decades. Key Points: New climate‐conditioned model framework represents fluvial, pluvial, and coastal flood hazards at high‐resolution globallyComprehensive validation studies suggest that the model is approaching local model skill in many casesEmissions reduction can hold flood hazards largely constant this century, though coastal flooding will increase drastically regardless [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00431397
Volume :
60
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Water Resources Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179298399
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036460