Back to Search Start Over

Large language models facilitate the generation of electronic health record phenotyping algorithms.

Authors :
Yan, Chao
Ong, Henry H
Grabowska, Monika E
Krantz, Matthew S
Su, Wu-Chen
Dickson, Alyson L
Peterson, Josh F
Feng, QiPing
Roden, Dan M
Stein, C Michael
Kerchberger, V Eric
Malin, Bradley A
Wei, Wei-Qi
Source :
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association; Sep2024, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p1994-2001, 8p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objectives Phenotyping is a core task in observational health research utilizing electronic health records (EHRs). Developing an accurate algorithm demands substantial input from domain experts, involving extensive literature review and evidence synthesis. This burdensome process limits scalability and delays knowledge discovery. We investigate the potential for leveraging large language models (LLMs) to enhance the efficiency of EHR phenotyping by generating high-quality algorithm drafts. Materials and Methods We prompted four LLMs—GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 of ChatGPT, Claude 2, and Bard—in October 2023, asking them to generate executable phenotyping algorithms in the form of SQL queries adhering to a common data model (CDM) for three phenotypes (ie, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and hypothyroidism). Three phenotyping experts evaluated the returned algorithms across several critical metrics. We further implemented the top-rated algorithms and compared them against clinician-validated phenotyping algorithms from the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network. Results GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 exhibited significantly higher overall expert evaluation scores in instruction following, algorithmic logic, and SQL executability, when compared to Claude 2 and Bard. Although GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 effectively identified relevant clinical concepts, they exhibited immature capability in organizing phenotyping criteria with the proper logic, leading to phenotyping algorithms that were either excessively restrictive (with low recall) or overly broad (with low positive predictive values). Conclusion GPT versions 3.5 and 4 are capable of drafting phenotyping algorithms by identifying relevant clinical criteria aligned with a CDM. However, expertise in informatics and clinical experience is still required to assess and further refine generated algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10675027
Volume :
31
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179262558
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae072