Back to Search Start Over

Public attitudes towards personal health data sharing in long-term epidemiological research: a Citizen Science approach in the KORA study.

Authors :
Rückert-Eheberg, Ina-Maria
Heier, Margit
Simon, Markus
Kraus, Monika
Peters, Annette
Linkohr, Birgit
Source :
BMC Public Health; 8/26/2024, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Loss to follow-up in long-term epidemiological studies is well-known and often substantial. Consequently, there is a risk of bias to the results. The motivation to take part in an epidemiological study can change over time, but the ways to minimize loss to follow-up are not well studied. The Citizen Science approach offers researchers to engage in direct discussions with study participants and to integrate their opinions and requirements into cohort management. Methods: Guided group discussions were conducted with study participants from the KORA cohort in the Augsburg Region in Germany, established 40 years ago, as well as a group of independently selected citizens. The aim was to look at the relevant aspects of health studies with a focus on long-term participation. A two-sided questionnaire was developed subsequently in a co-creation process and presented to 500 KORA participants and 2,400 employees of the research facility Helmholtz Munich. Results: The discussions revealed that altruistic motivations, (i.e. supporting research and public health), personal benefits (i.e. a health check-up during a study examination), data protection, and information about research results in layman's terms were crucial to ensure interest and long-term study participation. The results of the questionnaire confirmed these aspects and showed that exclusively digital information channels may be an obstacle for older and less educated people. Thus, paper-based media such as newsletters are still important. Conclusions: The findings shed light on cohort management and long-term engagement with study participants. A long-term health study needs to benefit public and individual health; the institution needs to be trustworthy; and the results and their impact need to be disseminated in widely understandable terms and by the right means of communication back to the participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712458
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Public Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179257592
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19730-0