Back to Search
Start Over
Implementation of updated enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery guidelines: adapted protocol in a single tertiary center.
- Source :
- Updates in Surgery; Aug2024, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p1397-1404, 8p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of an adapted protocol of enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) on outcomes. This is a single-center observational study comparing patients managed according to adapted ERABS protocol (March–May 2022) with a control group of old method (January 2021–February 2022). Totally, 253 bariatric patients were included in the study (n = 68) and control (n = 185) groups. Patients were mostly females (57.3% vs 70.2%; p = 0.053), of mean age 38.8 years and body mass index 41 ± 6.53 vs. 44.60 ± 7.37 kg/m<superscript>2</superscript> (p = 0.007) in study and control groups, respectively. The majority (90.5%) underwent primary bariatric surgery. Adapted ERABS protocol compliance was 98.5%. The study group had shorter hospital stay (mean 2.86 ± 0.51 vs. 4.03 ± 0.28 days; p < 0.001), similar rates of total (3% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.92) and major complications (1.5% vs. 0, p = 0.10). Readmission rates were similar (1.5% vs 1.6%, p = 0.92). Applied only in the study group, early ambulation (p < 0.001), opioid restriction, and preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), resulted in satisfactory scores (mean total visual analogue score 1.93 ± 0.80, morphine milligram equivalent 34.0 ± 14.5, and mean total PONV grade 0.17 ± 0.36). In conclusion, implementing adapted ERABS guidelines improved patients' postoperative care, raising awareness to pain management. Length of stay was shortened without safety compromise. Efforts to abandon old-school routines seem worthwhile, even if ERABS is partially implemented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2038131X
- Volume :
- 76
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Updates in Surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 179167722
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01824-4