Back to Search Start Over

We Have More in Common than We Think: A Comparison of Scientific Skills and Disciplinary Practices in the Guiding Documents for Biology, Chemistry, and Mathematics.

Authors :
Silverio, Daniel L.
Villa-Cuesta, Eugenia
Hyslop, Alison
Kolack, Kevin
Sobel, Sabrina G.
Source :
Journal of College Science Teaching; Sep/Oct2024, Vol. 53 Issue 5, p472-479, 8p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Students are encouraged to develop a set of scientific skills and disciplinary practices common across the STEM disciplines. These skills (scientific inquiry, quantitative skills, laboratory and computational skills, communication skills, teamwork/interpersonal skills, interdisciplinary competency) are highlighted as important in discipline-based guiding documents—biology (Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action), chemistry (American Chemical Society Guidelines and Evaluation Procedures for Bachelor's Degree Programs), and mathematics (A Common Vision for Undergraduate Mathematical Sciences Programs in 2025)—for undergraduate teaching of biology, chemistry, and mathematics, and for the professional success of STEM college graduates. To promote interdisciplinary teaching and learning of STEM, we present a comprehensive comparison of the different disciplines' competency statements for undergraduate education. This organization and comparison of commonalities in scientific skills and disciplinary practices can be used by faculty and departments to come together to break down traditional silos, help their students more easily apply learning from one STEM discipline to another, and to create institutional change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0047231X
Volume :
53
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of College Science Teaching
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179147082
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2024.2373027