Back to Search Start Over

CHAPTER IX: PRIVATE ANTITRUST SUITS: K: Antitrust Violation as a Defense to Other Claims.

Source :
Annual Review of Antitrust Law Developments; 2023, p1-18, 18p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

1. Contract ClaimsIn Epic Games v. Apple, Inc.,[650] the Ninth Circuit rejected Epic's defense of illegality in a breach of contract action.[651] Epic stipulated that it breached the contract at issue by implementing an upgrade to its app to allow it to process in-game transactions outside of Apple's payment software,[652] but it argued that the contract was illegal, void against public policy, and unconscionable.[653] Because the court found that Epic's defense rested on its rejected Sherman Act claims, it affirmed the rejection of the illegality defenses.[654] [Extracted from the article]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15439305
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annual Review of Antitrust Law Developments
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
179116494