Back to Search Start Over

Safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescribing: OpenSAFELY-TPP analysis of 20.5 million adults’ electronic health records.

Authors :
Homan, Karen
Seeley, Rachel
Fisher, Louis
Khatri, Sajida
Smith, Katie
Jamieson, Tony
Speed, Victoria
Roberts, Carol A
Mehrkar, Amir
Bacon, Sebastian
MacKenna, Brian
Goldacre, Ben
Source :
BJGP Open; Jul2024, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p1-11, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic many patients were switched from warfarin to direct)acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which require the creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated to ensure the correct dose is prescribed to avoid bleeding or reduced efficacy. Aim: To identify the study population proportion prescribed a DOAC. Of these, the proportion with recorded: weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine, CrCl and atrial fibrillation (AF). To analyse the proportion of patients with recorded AF and CrCl prescribed a recommended DOAC dose. Design & setting: A retrospective cohort study of 20.5 million adult NHS patients’ electronic health records (EHRs) in England in the OpenSAFELY-TPP platform (January 2018–February 2023). Method: Patients on DOACs were analysed for age, sex, recorded weight, eGFR, creatinine, CrCl and AF. Prescribed DOAC doses in patients with recorded AF were compared with recommended doses for recorded CrCl and determined as either recommended, higher than recommended (overdose), or lower than recommended (underdose). Results: In February 2023, weight, eGFR, creatinine, CrCl, and AF were recorded in 72.8%, 92.4%, 94.3%, 73.5%, and 73.9% of study population, respectively. Both AF and CrCl were recorded for 56.7% of patients. Of these, 86.2% received the recommended, and 13.8% non-recommended, DOAC doses. Conclusion: CrCl is not recorded for a substantial number of patients on DOACs. We recommend that national organisations tasked with safety, collectively update guidance on the appropriate weight to use in the Cockcroft–Gault equation, clarify that CrCl is not equivalent to eGFR, and work with GP clinical system suppliers to standardise the calculation of CrCl in the EHR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23983795
Volume :
8
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BJGP Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179114266
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0163