Bifocal coronary sinus pacing and transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation: an innovative combined approach.

One of the most common complications of tricuspid valve replacement is atrioventricular block (AVB), often requiring permanent pacing. The endocardial pacemaker lead, placed in the right ventricle, may sometimes interfere with the implanted prosthesis, causing its early dysfunction and the need for alternative sites of pacing. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first case of a successful combined percutaneous procedure consisting of the implantation of two leads in the coronary sinus for univentricular bifocal pacing and a transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation in a young patient with severe dysfunction of the tricuspid bioprosthesis, requiring permanent pacing for a postsurgical complete atrioventricular block. Tricuspid valve replacement with surgery can often lead to cardiac rhythm disorders requiring a permanent pacemaker. This device may occasionally damage the tricuspid prosthesis. We present the first case of a combined procedure of tricuspid valve replacement and device implantation distant from the prosthesis without the need for a surgical approach in a young patient with severe tricuspid prosthesis malfunctioning and permanent pacing. Article highlights Right-sided infective endocarditis in young patients may be caused by intravenous drug use, leading to tricuspid valve injury and the need for valve replacement with a prosthesis. Complete atrioventricular block represents an important postoperative complication of valve surgery requiring, frequently, the implantation of a permanent pacemaker. The endocardial pacemaker lead in the right ventricle may sometimes interfere with the implanted bioprosthesis, causing its early degeneration with the need for prosthesis replacement and research of other sites of pacing. Surgical replacement of a malfunctioning tricuspid prosthesis is among the highest-risk procedures. A combined percutaneous implantation of two pacing leads in the coronary sinus for univentricular bifocal pacing and a transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in patients requiring a permanent pacing site. In the case of pacemaker dependency, the use of actively fixating leads should be preferable to passive ones in order to minimize the risk of lead dislocation. Other strategies such as pacing with epicardial leads, the use of his-bundle pacing, or leadless pacemakers were taken into account but not deemed suitable. The Heart Team plays a critical role in decision-making in these particular conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]