Back to Search Start Over

The geology and evolution of the Near-Earth binary asteroid system (65803) Didymos.

Authors :
Barnouin, Olivier
Ballouz, Ronald-Louis
Marchi, Simone
Vincent, Jean-Baptiste
Agrusa, Harrison
Zhang, Yun
Ernst, Carolyn M.
Pajola, Maurizio
Tusberti, Filippo
Lucchetti, Alice
Daly, R. Terik
Palmer, Eric
Walsh, Kevin J.
Michel, Patrick
Sunshine, Jessica M.
Rizos, Juan L.
Farnham, Tony L.
Richardson, Derek C.
Parro, Laura M.
Murdoch, Naomi
Source :
Nature Communications; 7/30/2024, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1-14, 14p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Images collected during NASA's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission provide the first resolved views of the Didymos binary asteroid system. These images reveal that the primary asteroid, Didymos, is flattened and has plausible undulations along its equatorial perimeter. At high elevations, its surface is rough and contains large boulders and craters; at low elevations its surface is smooth and possesses fewer large boulders and craters. Didymos' moon, Dimorphos, possesses an intimate mixture of boulders, several asteroid-wide lineaments, and a handful of craters. The surfaces of both asteroids include boulders that are large relative to their host body, suggesting that both asteroids are rubble piles. Based on these observations, our models indicate that Didymos has a surface cohesion ≤ 1 Pa and an interior cohesion of ∼10 Pa, while Dimorphos has a surface cohesion of <0.9 Pa. Crater size-frequency analyzes indicate the surface age of Didymos is 40–130 times older than Dimorphos, with likely absolute ages of ~ 12.5 Myr and <0.3 Myr, respectively. Solar radiation could have increased Didymos' spin rate leading to internal deformation and surface mass shedding, which likely created Dimorphos. Images collected during NASA's DART mission of the asteroid Didymos and its moon, Dimorphos, are used to explore the origin and evolution of the binary system. Authors analysis indicate that both asteroids are weak rubble piles and that Didymos' surface should be about 40 to 130 times older than Dimorphos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20411723
Volume :
15
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Nature Communications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178777461
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50146-x