Back to Search Start Over

Incidence of urinary incontinence following endoscopic laser enucleation of the prostate by en-bloc and non-en-bloc techniques: a multicenter, real-world experience of 5068 patients.

Authors :
Castellani, Daniele
Gauhar, Vineet
Khi Yung Fong
Sofer, Mario
Rodríguez Socarrás, Moisés
Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N.
Lie Kwok Ying
Biligere, Sarvajit
Ho Yee Tiong
Elterman, Dean
Mahajan, Abhay
Taratkin, Mark
Ivanovich, Sorokin Nikolai
Bhatia, Tanuj Pal
Enikeev, Dmitry
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Bendigeri, Mohammed Taif
Yuen-Chun Teoh, Jeremy
Dellabella, Marco
Gómez Sancha, Fernando
Source :
Asian Journal of Andrology; May/Jun2024, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p233-238, 6p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

We aim to evaluate the incidence of incontinence following laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) comparing en-bloc (Group 1) versus 2-lobe/3-lobe techniques (Group 2). We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing EEP for benign prostatic enlargement in 12 centers between January 2020 and January 2022. Data were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). There were 1711 patients in Group 1 and 3357 patients in Group 2. Patients in Group 2 were significantly younger (68 [62-73] years vs 69 [63-74] years, P = 0.002). Median (interquartile range) prostate volume (PV) was similar between the groups (70 [52-92] ml in Group 1 vs 70 [54-90] ml in Group 2, P = 0.774). There was no difference in preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, or maximum flow rate. Enucleation, morcellation, and total surgical time were significantly shorter in Group 1. Within 1 month, overall incontinence rate was 6.3% in Group 1 versus 5.3% in Group 2 (P = 0.12), and urge incontinence was significantly higher in Group 1 (55.1% vs 37.3% in Group 2, P < 0.001). After 3 months, the overall rate of incontinence was 1.7% in Group 1 versus 2.3% in Group 2 (P = 0.06), and SUI was significantly higher in Group 2 (55.6% vs 24.1% in Group 1, P = 0.002). At multivariable analysis, PV and IPSS were factors significantly associated with higher odds of transient SUI/MUI. PV, surgical time, and no early apical release technique were factors associated with higher odds of persistent SUI/MUI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1008682X
Volume :
26
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Asian Journal of Andrology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178755256
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202375