Back to Search Start Over

A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols.

Authors :
Nydahl, Peter
Liu, Keibun
Bellelli, Giuseppe
Benbenishty, Julie
van den Boogaard, Mark
Caplan, Gideon
Chung, Chi Ryang
Elhadi, Muhammed
Gurjar, Mohan
Calle, Gabi Heras-La
Hoffmann, Magdalena
Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen
Krewulak, Karla
Mailhot, Tanya
Morandi, Alessandro
Nawa, Ricardo Kenji
Oh, Esther S
Collet, Marie O
Paulino, Maria Carolina
Lindroth, Heidi
Source :
Age & Ageing; Jul2024, Vol. 53 Issue 7, p1-9, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n  = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n  = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n  = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n  = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [ n  = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289–9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00020729
Volume :
53
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Age & Ageing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178718743
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae129