Back to Search Start Over

The development and validation of a conceptual definition of avoidable transitions from long‐term care to the emergency department: A mixed methods study.

Authors :
Cummings, Greta G.
Tate, Kaitlyn
Spiers, Jude
El‐Bialy, Rowan
McLane, Patrick
Park, Claire Su‐Yeon
Penconek, Tatiana
Cummings, Garnet
Robinson, Carole A.
Reid, Robert Colin
Estabrooks, Carole A.
Rowe, Brian H.
Anderson, Carol
Source :
Health Science Reports; Jul2024, Vol. 7 Issue 7, p1-23, 23p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Transitions to and from Emergency Departments (EDs) can be detrimental to long‐term care (LTC) residents and burden the healthcare system. While reducing avoidable transfers is imperative, various terms are used interchangeably including inappropriate, preventable, or unnecessary transitions. Our study objectives were to develop a conceptual definition of avoidable LTC‐ED transitions and to verify the level of stakeholder agreement with this definition. Methods: The EXamining Aged Care Transitions study adopted an exploratory sequential mixed‐method design. The study was conducted in 2015–2016 in 16 LTC facilities, 1 ED, and 1 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) in a major urban center in western Canada. Phase 1 included 80 participants, (healthcare aides, licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, LTC managers, family members of residents, and EMS staff). We conducted semistructured interviews (n = 25) and focus groups (n = 19). In Phase 2, 327 ED staff, EMS staff, LTC staff, and medical directors responded to a survey based on the qualitative findings. Results: Avoidable transitions were attributed to limited resources in LTC, insufficient preventive care, and resident or family wishes. The definition generated was: A transition of an LTC resident to the ED is considered avoidable if: (a) Diagnostic testing, medical assessment, and treatment can be accessed in a timely manner by other means; (b) the reasons for a transfer are unclear and the transition would increase the disorientation, pain, or discomfort of a resident, outweighing a clear benefit of a transfer; and (c) the transition is against the wishes expressed by the resident over time, including through informal and undocumented conversations. There was a high level of agreement with the definition across the four participant groups. Conclusions and Implications: To effectively reduce LTC resident avoidable transitions, stakeholders must share a common definition. Our conceptual definition may significantly contribute to improved care for LTC residents. Key points: Important dimensions in assessing transition avoidability include timely diagnostic testing availability, in‐facility assessment and treatment options, clear transfer purpose, risk/benefit analysis for resident well‐being, and recognition of advanced care goals and informal care preferences.Our findings highlighted essential differences between perceptions of unnecessary and avoidable transitions.Avoidable transitions were attributed to limited resources in long‐term care, insufficient preventive care, and resident or family wishes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23988835
Volume :
7
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Health Science Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178648679
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2204