Morbidity following robot‐assisted surgery in a gynecological oncology setting: A cohort study.

Introduction: The objective of the study was to provide a comprehensive description of perioperative morbidity associated with robot‐assisted surgery (RAS) in a gynecological oncology setting in order to improve the preoperative counseling of women and support shared decision‐making. Material and Methods: All women scheduled for intended RAS between January 2015 and December 2022 were prospectively included in an electronic morbidity database for the analyses of perioperative complications. Results: In total, 2225 women were included. Sixty‐four patients (2.9%) experienced an intraoperative complication. Intraoperative complications were associated with a higher rate of conversion to laparotomy (15.6% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of major postoperative morbidity (9.3% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (9.3% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), compared to cases without intraoperative complications. Thirty‐day postoperative morbidity was evaluated according to the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System. Grade 3–5 events were considered major. A total of 57 patients (2.6%) experienced a major event after surgery, postoperative rupture of the vaginal vault being the most common complication requiring surgical intervention. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 49 cases (2.2%) and was associated with higher intraoperative blood loss (300 mL vs. 25 mL, p < 0.001), a higher rate of postoperative major events (20.4% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (11.8% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates low rates of major perioperative morbidity and conversion to laparotomy after RAS performed by trained high‐volume surgeons in a gynecological oncology setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]