THE RULE OF LAW THROUGH HE RULE OF LAW THROUGH JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN UDICIAL ACTIVISM IN SOUTH AFRICA.

The South African Courts frequently juggle diff erent roles within the country’s governance. This causes discomfort among some of the role players within the polity as it is seen as judicial encroachment in matters outside the court’s role. In the South African context of separation of powers, the role of each branch of government is not always clearly defi ned, and now and again, it gains perspective as courts interpret parliamentary legislation and executive policies. The court’s role and limitations often come under scrutiny. This causes confl icts between the respective branches of government regarding the extent of judicial intervention concerning other branches of government, namely the legislature and executive. This article examines the role and limits of judicial intervention in the terrain of other branches of government within the context of separation of powers as envisaged by the South African Constitution. The doctrine of separation of powers entails the establishment of a trilateral government. The envisaged government consists of the legislature, which enacts laws, an executive that recognises and executes the law and an independent judiciary to regulate public power when all else fails. The article attempts to clarify the place and role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law in a constitutional state such as South Africa amid rampant complaints of judicial overreach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]