Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic accuracy of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors :
Yuta, Fukuishi
Kawamori, Hiroyuki
Toba, Takayoshi
Hiromasa, Takashi
Sasaki, Satoru
Hamana, Tomoyo
Fujii, Hiroyuki
Osumi, Yuto
Iwane, Seigo
Yamamoto, Tetsuya
Naniwa, Shota
Sakamoto, Yuki
Matsuhama, Koshi
Hirata, Ken-ichi
Otake, Hiromasa
Source :
Heart & Vessels; Aug2024, Vol. 39 Issue 8, p735-745, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) is a novel computational method that enables accurate estimation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) using a single angiographic projection. However, its diagnostic value in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains unclear. Method: We included 25 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe AS with intermediate or greater (30–90%) coronary artery disease (CAD). Pre- and post-TAVR μQFR, QFR, instantaneous flow reserve (iFR), and post-TAVR invasive FFR values were measured. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of pre-TAVR μQFR, QFR, and iFR using post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.80 as a reference standard of ischemia. Result: Pre-TAVR μQFR was significantly correlated with post-TAVR FFR (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001). The area under the curve of pre-TAVR μQFR on post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.8 was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–0.98), comparable to that of pre-TAVR iFR (0.86 [95% CI 0.71–0.98], p = 0.97). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of pre-TAVR μQFR on post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.8 were 84.2% (95% CI 68.7–93.4), 61.6% (95% CI 31.6–86.1), 96.0% (95% CI 79.6–99.9), 88.9% (95% CI 52.9–98.3), and 82.8% (95% CI 70.6–90.6), respectively. For pre-TAVR iFR, these values were 76.5% (95% CI 58.8–89.3), 90.9% (95% CI 58.7–99.8), 69.6% (95% CI 47.1–86.8), 58.8% (95% CI 42.8–73.1), and 94.1% (95% CI 70.8–99.1), respectively. Conclusion: μQFR could be useful for the physiological evaluation of patients with severe AS with concomitant CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09108327
Volume :
39
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Heart & Vessels
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178529684
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02387-5