Back to Search
Start Over
Exploring the factors impacting choice and quality of overnight private hospital stays and consumer perspectives on patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in Australia: a qualitative interview study.
- Source :
- Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes; 7/20/2024, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p1-11, 11p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Patient reported experience measures (PREMs) are tools often utilised in hospitals to support quality improvements and to provide objective feedback on care experiences. Less commonly PREMs can be used to support consumers choices in their hospital care. Little is known about the experience and views of the Australian consumer regarding PREMs nor the considerations these consumers have when they need to make decisions about attending hospital. This study aimed to explore consumer awareness of PREMs, consumer attitudes towards PREMs and the utility of PREMs as a decision-making tool in accessing hospital care. Methods: Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews conducted over the phone. Participants (n = 40) were recruited from across Australia and purposively sampled according to key characteristics: holding private health insurance, > 30-years of age, may have accessed private hospital care in the past year, variety of educational and cultural backgrounds, and if urban or rural residing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Results: Four overarching themes and six subthemes were identified from the data. Major findings were that prior awareness of PREMs was limited; however, many had filled in a PREM either for themselves or for someone they cared for following a hospital stay. Most respondents preferred to listen to experience of self or family/friends or the recommendation of their physician when choosing a hospital to attend. Participants appeared to be more interested in the treating clinician than the hospital with this clinician often dictating the hospital or hospital options. If provided choice in hospital, issues of additional costs, timeliness of treatment and location were important factors. Conclusion: While PREMs were considered a possible tool to assist in hospital decision-making process, previous hospital experiences, the doctor and knowing up-front cost are an overriding consideration for consumers when choosing their hospital. Consideration to format and presentation of PREMs data is needed to facilitate understanding and allow meaningful comparisons. Future research could examine the considerations of those consumers who primarily access public healthcare facilities and how to improve the utility of PREMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- MEDICAL care use
HEALTH literacy
CONSENSUS (Social sciences)
INTERNET searching
PROPRIETARY hospitals
PATIENTS
MEDICAL quality control
RESEARCH funding
QUALITATIVE research
HOSPITAL care
HOSPITAL admission & discharge
CONSUMER attitudes
INTERVIEWING
DECISION making
JUDGMENT sampling
EXPERIENCE
THEMATIC analysis
RESEARCH methodology
QUALITY of life
HEALTH outcome assessment
DATA analysis software
QUALITY assurance
PATIENTS' attitudes
CUSTOMER satisfaction
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 25098020
- Volume :
- 8
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 178528142
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00755-3