Back to Search Start Over

Exploring consensus algorithms: A comprehensive examination and comparative analysis.

Authors :
Tripathi, Arun Kumar
Jain, Apoorv
Kumar, Amit
Singh, Simran
Shukla, Brijesh
Source :
AIP Conference Proceedings; 2024, Vol. 3168 Issue 1, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The emergence of Industry 4.0 leads to the latest technology, and blockchain is one of them. Blockchain guarantees transparency, decentralization and protection of a transaction. It revolutionizes industries where entrust and security have vital significance. In the blockchain network, data is recorded in the form of blocks. The first block of the blockchain network is acknowledged as Genesis-Block. The rest of the blocks are added to the blockchain in chronological order so that participants entities can keep an eye on digital transactions deprived of the interference of third parties or central authorities. Transactions on the blockchain network require a set of rules and regulations. These rules are known as consensus algorithms. The consensus algorithm is a procedure employed for common agreement, validation, verification, and confirmation of transactions in a blockchain network. Examples of popular consensus algorithms are Proof-of-Work (PoW), Proof-of-Burn (PoB), Proof-of- Stake (BoS), Directed-Acyclic-Graph (DAG), Practical-Byzantine-Fault-Tolerance (PBFT), Proof-of-Elapsed-Time (PoET), etc. Initially, the paper introduces the evolution and categorization of blockchain networks. Subsequently, a brief discussion on available consensus algorithms and the inclusion process of a node in blockchain networks. Furthermore, the paper compares existing blockchain consensus algorithms based on various significant parameters such as scalability, transaction rate, tolerated power, etc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0094243X
Volume :
3168
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
AIP Conference Proceedings
Publication Type :
Conference
Accession number :
178212510
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0221104