Back to Search Start Over

Radiation Oncologists' Perspectives on Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Survey from Korean Oligometastasis Working Group.

Authors :
Yoo, Gyu Sang
Park, Sunmin
Rim, Chai Hong
Cho, Won Kyung
Chang, Ah Ram
Kim, Young Seok
Ahn, Yong Chan
Chie, Eui Kyu
Source :
Current Oncology; Jun2024, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p3239-3251, 13p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Interest in the oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is increasing, and various clinical studies have reported the benefits of metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT) in OMPC. However, the recognition regarding the adopted definitions, methodologies of assessment, and therapeutic approaches is diverse among radiation oncologists. This study aims to evaluate the level of agreement for issues in OMPC among radiation oncologists. Methods: We generated 15 key questions (KQs) for OMPC relevant to definition, diagnosis, local therapies, and endpoints. Additionally, three clinical scenarios representing synchronous metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) (case 1), metachronous mPC with visceral metastasis (case 2), and metachronous mPC with castration-resistance and history of polymetastasis (case 3) were developed. The 15 KQs were adapted according to each scenario and transformed into 23 questions with 6–9 per scenario. The survey was distributed to 80 radiation oncologists throughout the Republic of Korea. Answer options with 0.0–29.9%, 30–49.9%, 50–69.9%, 70–79.9%, 80–89.9%, and 90–100% agreements were considered as no, minimal, weak, moderate, strong, and near perfect agreement, respectively. Results: Forty-five candidates voluntarily participated in this study. Among 23 questions, near perfect (n = 4), strong (n = 3), or moderate (n = 2) agreements were shown in nine. For the case recognized as OMPC with agreements of 93% (case 1), near perfect agreements on the application of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for whole metastatic lesions were achieved. While ≥70% agreements regarding optimal dose-fractionation for metastasis-directed RT (MDRT) has not been achieved, stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is favored by clinicians with higher clinical volume. Conclusion: For the case recognized as OMPC, near perfect agreement for the application of definitive RT for whole metastatic lesions was reached. SBRT was more favored as a MDRT by clinicians with a higher clinical volume. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
11980052
Volume :
31
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Current Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178152590
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31060245