Upfront surgery versus definitive radiotherapy: competing risk analyses for cancer-specific and noncancer mortality in oropharyngeal cancer.

Purpose: The optimal treatment strategy for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is undetermined. We aim to compare the survival outcomes of OPC patients treated with upfront surgery versus definitive radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A total of 8057 cases were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific and noncancer mortalities, which were estimated using cumulative incidence function and compared by Gray's test. Univariate and multivariate Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to estimate the effects of treatment modality on mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed in propensity-score-matched cohorts. All the analyses were conducted separately in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative and HPV-positive cohorts. Results: In the HPV-negative cohort, definitive RT was independently associated with increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.64; P = 0.017) and noncancer mortality (adjusted SHR, 1.59; 95% CI 1.13–2.25; P = 0.008). In the HPV-positive cohort, definitive RT was independently associated with increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (adjusted SHR, 1.51; 95% CI 1.23–1.85; P < 0.001) and noncancer mortality (adjusted SHR, 1.53; 95% CI 1.11–2.12; P = 0.009). Conclusion: Upfront surgery is a superior treatment modality compared with definitive RT in terms of lowering cancer-specific and noncancer mortality in OPC patients, regardless of HPV status. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]