Back to Search Start Over

Effects of Different Loading Types on the Validity and Magnitude of Force-Velocity Relationship Parameters.

Authors :
Jankovic, Goran
Janicijevic, Danica
Nedeljkovic, Aleksandar
Petrovic, Milos R.
Cosic, Marko
Garcia-Ramos, Amador
Source :
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach; Jul2024, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p630-636, 7p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Force-velocity (F-V) relationship models gained popularity as a tool for muscle mechanical assessment. However, it is not clear whether the validity of the F-V relationship parameters (maximal theoretical force [ F <subscript>0</subscript>], velocity [ V <subscript>0</subscript>] and power [ P <subscript>max</subscript>]) is affected using different load types: gravitational (W, rubber bands pulling the barbell downward), inertial (I, rubber bands pulling the barbell, which is equalized to the weight of the added plates upward), and combined (W + I, weight of the plates). Hypothesis: Load type would affect both the magnitude and validity of F-V relationship parameters. The highest magnitude and validity was expected for F <subscript>0</subscript> using a W, for V <subscript>0</subscript> using an I, and for P <subscript>max</subscript> using a W + I load. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: A total of 13 resistance-trained men (body mass, 87.7 ± 11.2 kg and body height, 183.9 ± 6.4 cm) performed bench press (BP) throws (BPTs) using 3 types of loads against 30 to 80 kg. The validity of F-V relationship parameters was explored with respect to the tests used traditionally for force (maximal voluntary contraction and 1-repetition maximum [1RM]), velocity (maximal velocity achieved during almost unloaded tasks), and power (BPT against the 50%1RM and medicine ball throws) assessment. Results: The W + I loading promoted the highest values of F <subscript>0</subscript> and P <subscript>max</subscript>, while the highest magnitude of V <subscript>0</subscript> was promoted by the I loading. The validity was acceptable for F <subscript>0</subscript> obtained using the 3 loading conditions with respect to the BP 1RM (r range, 0.30-0.83), and V <subscript>0</subscript> obtained using the I loading with respect to the stick throw (r = 0.54). Conclusion: The magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters is affected by load type, but their validity with respect to standardized tests is comparable, with the exception of the higher validity of V <subscript>0</subscript> when obtained using the I loading. Clinical Relevance: Any load type can be used for assessing F <subscript>0</subscript>, while I load should be selected when assessing V <subscript>0</subscript>. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19417381
Volume :
16
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178022936
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231182131