Back to Search Start Over

Enthesitis in a European registry-based cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: clinical burden, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment response.

Authors :
Mathew, AJ
Lund, M. L.
Pedersen, MP
Rasmussen, SH
Glintborg, B
Loft, AG
Nissen, MJ
Möller, B
Rodrigues, AM
Santos, FP
Rotar, Z
Tomšič, M
Relas, H
Peltomaa, R
Gudbjornsson, B
Löve, TJ
Kocaer, SB
Koken Avsar, A
Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, L
Østergaard, M
Source :
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology; Jul2024, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p237-247, 11p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

To explore the registration of enthesitis among biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment across 12 European registries, compare the disease burden and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients with and without enthesitis, and assess the enthesitis treatment response. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs at first TNFi (TNFi-1) initiation (baseline) were assessed in patients with PsA, diagnosed by a rheumatologist, with versus without assessment of entheses and between those with versus without enthesitis. Enthesitis scores and resolution frequency were identified at follow-up. Of 10 547 patients in the European Spondyloarthritis (EuroSpA) Research Collaboration Network initiating TNFi, 1357 underwent evaluation for enthesitis. Eight registries included a validated scoring system for enthesitis. At baseline, 874 patients underwent entheses assessment [Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) 485 patients, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) 389 patients]. Enthesitis was detected by MASES in 170/485 (35%, mean score ± sd 3.1 ± 2.4) and by SPARCC in 236/389 (61%, 4 ± 3.4). Achilles enthesitis was most frequent, by both MASES (unilateral/bilateral 28%/9%) and SPARCC (48%/18%). MASES/SPARCC baseline and follow-up scores for TNFi-1 were available for 100/105 patients. Of these, 63 patients (63%) (MASES) and 46 (43.8%) (SPARCC) achieved resolution of enthesitis. The site-specific enthesitis resolution was overall lower at SPARCC sites (peripheral; 63–80%) than at MASES sites (mainly axial; 82–100%) following TNFi-1. Disease activity and PROs were worse in patients with versus without enthesitis. Entheseal assessments are only registered in a minority of patients with PsA in routine care. When assessed, enthesitis was common, and a substantial proportion demonstrated resolution following treatment with TNFi-1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03009742
Volume :
53
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177963953
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2024.2336743