Back to Search Start Over

Understanding rural‐urban differences in veterans' internet access, use and patient preferences for telemedicine.

Authors :
O'Shea, Amy M. J.
Gibson, Mikayla
Merchant, James
Rewerts, Kelby
Miell, Kelly
Kaboli, Peter J.
Shimada, Stephanie L.
Source :
Journal of Rural Health; Jun2024, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p438-445, 8p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The expansion of telemedicine (e.g., telephone or video) in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) raises concerns for health care disparities between rural and urban veterans. Factors impeding telemedicine use (e.g., broadband, digital literacy, age) disproportionally affect rural veterans. Purpose: To examine veteran‐reported broadband access, internet use, familiarity with, and preferences for telemedicine stratified by residential rurality. Methods: Three hundred fifty veterans with a VA primary care visit in March 2022 completed a 30‐min computer‐assisted telephone interview. The sampling design stratified veterans by residential rurality (i.e., rural or urban) and how primary care was delivered (i.e., in‐person or by video). Counts and weighted percentages are reported. Findings: After accounting for survey weights, 96.2% of respondents had in‐home internet access and 89.5% reported functional connection speeds. However, rural‐ compared to urban‐residing veterans were less likely to experience a telemedicine visit in the past year (74.1% vs. 85.2%; p = 0.02). When comparing telemedicine to in‐person visits, rural versus urban‐residing veterans rated them not as good (45.3% vs. 36.8%), just as good (51.1% vs. 53.1%), or better (3.5% vs. 10.0%) (p = 0.05). To make telemedicine visits easier, veterans, regardless of where they lived, recommended technology training (46.4%), help accessing the internet (26.1%), or provision of an internet‐enabled device (25.9%). Conclusions: Though rural‐residing veterans were less likely to experience a telemedicine visit, the same actionable facilitators to improve telemedicine access were reported regardless of residential rurality. Importantly, technology training was most often recommended. Policy makers, patient advocates, and other stakeholders should consider novel initiatives to provide training resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0890765X
Volume :
40
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Rural Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177962366
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12805