Back to Search Start Over

Relative Bioavailability of Dolutegravir (DTG) and Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate (F/TAF) Administered as Paediatric Tablet Formulations in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors :
Bevers, Lisanne A. H.
Kamphuis, Anne E. M.
van der Wekken-Pas, L. C. Wendy
Leisegang, Rory
Burger, David M.
Colbers, Angela
Source :
Clinical Pharmacokinetics; May2024, Vol. 63 Issue 5, p721-728, 8p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and objective: Within the UNIVERSAL project (RIA2019PD-2882) we aim to develop a paediatric dolutegravir (DTG)/emtricitabine (FTC or F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) fixed-dose combination. To inform dosing of this study, we undertook a relative bioavailability (RBA) study in healthy volunteers to investigate a potential pharmacokinetic effect when paediatric formulations of DTG and F/TAF are taken together. Methods: Participants received all of the following treatments as paediatric formulations in randomised order: a single dose of 180/22.5 mg F/TAF; a single dose of 30 mg DTG; a single dose of 180/22.5 mg F/TAF plus 30 mg DTG. Blood concentrations of DTG, FTC, TAF, and tenofovir (TFV) were measured over 48 h post-dose. If the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios of area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C<subscript>max</subscript>) of each compound were within 0.70–1.43, we considered this as no clinically relevant PK interaction. Results: A total of 15 healthy volunteers were included. We did not observe a clinically relevant PK interaction between the paediatric DTG and F/TAF formulations for the compounds DTG, FTC, and TFV. For TAF, the lower boundaries of the 90% CIs of the GLSM ratios of the AUC<subscript>0–∞</subscript> and C<subscript>max</subscript> fell outside our acceptance criteria of 0.70–1.43. Conclusions: Although TAF AUC and C<subscript>max</subscript> 90% CIs fell outside the pre-defined criteria (0.62–1.11 and 0.65–1.01, respectively), no consistent effect on TAF PK was observed, likely due to high inter-subject variability. Moreover, there are several reasons to rely on TFV exposure as being more clinically relevant than TAF exposure. Therefore, we found no clinically relevant interactions in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03125963
Volume :
63
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177776978
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01365-4