Back to Search Start Over

Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF Study.

Authors :
Tilz, Roland Richard
Feher, Marcel
Vogler, Julia
Bode, Kerstin
Duta, Alexandru Ionut
Ortolan, Angela
Lopez, Lisbeth Delgado
Küchler, Mirco
Mamaev, Roman
Lyan, Evgeny
Sommer, Philipp
Braun, Martin
Sciacca, Vanessa
Demming, Thomas
Maslova, Vera
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Heeger, Christian-Hendrik
Eitel, Charlotte
Popescu, Sorin Stefan
Source :
EP: Europace; May2024, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aims Simplified ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are increasingly performed worldwide. One of the most common complications following PVI are vascular access-related complications. Lately, venous closure systems (VCSs) were introduced into clinical practice, aiming to reduce the time of bed rest, to increase the patients' comfort, and to reduce vascular access-related complications. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of using a VCS to achieve haemostasis following single-shot PVI to the actual standard of care [figure-of-eight suture and manual compression (MC)]. Methods and results This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial performed at three German centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo haemostasis either by means of VCS (VCS group) or of a figure-of-eight suture and MC (F8 group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to ambulation, while the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major periprocedural adverse events until hospital discharge. A total of 125 patients were randomized. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The VCS group showed a shorter time to ambulation [109.0 (82.0, 160.0) vs. 269.0 (243.8, 340.5) min; P < 0.001], shorter time to haemostasis [1 (1, 2) vs. 5 (2, 10) min; P < 0.001], and shorter time to discharge eligibility [270 (270, 270) vs. 340 (300, 458) min; P < 0.001]. No major vascular access-related complication was reported in either group. A trend towards a lower incidence of minor vascular access-related complications on the day of procedure was observed in the VCS group [7 (11.1%) vs. 15 (24.2%); P = 0.063] as compared to the control group. Conclusion Following AF ablation, the use of a VCS results in a significantly shorter time to ambulation, time to haemostasis, and time to discharge eligibility. No major vascular access-related complications were identified. The use of MC and a figure-of-eight suture showed a trend towards a higher incidence of minor vascular access-related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10995129
Volume :
26
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
EP: Europace
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177681760
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae105