Back to Search Start Over

Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors :
Kim, Ji Yoon
Jin, Sang-Man
Sim, Kang Hee
Kim, Bo-Yeon
Cho, Jae Hyoung
Moon, Jun Sung
Lim, Soo
Kang, Eun Seok
Park, Cheol-Young
Kim, Sin Gon
Kim, Jae Hyeon
Source :
Diabetologia; Jul2024, Vol. 67 Issue 7, p1223-1234, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of stand-alone intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) with or without a structured education programme and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). Methods: In this 24 week randomised open-label multicentre trial, adults with type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy with HbA<subscript>1c</subscript> levels of 58–108 mmol/mol (7.5–12.0%) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to isCGM with a structured education programme on adjusting insulin dose and timing according to graphical patterns in CGM (intervention group), isCGM with conventional education (control group 1) or BGM with conventional education (control group 2). Block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and investigators was not possible. The primary outcome was change in HbA<subscript>1c</subscript> from baseline at 24 weeks, assessed using ANCOVA with the baseline value as a covariate. Results: A total of 159 individuals were randomised (n=53 for each group); 148 were included in the full analysis set, with 52 in the intervention group, 49 in control group 1 and 47 in control group 2. The mean (± SD) HbA<subscript>1c</subscript> level at baseline was 68.19±10.94 mmol/mol (8.39±1.00%). The least squares mean change (± SEM) from baseline HbA<subscript>1c</subscript> at 24 weeks was −10.96±1.35 mmol/mol (−1.00±0.12%) in the intervention group, −6.87±1.39 mmol/mol (−0.63±0.13%) in control group 1 (p=0.0367 vs intervention group) and −6.32±1.42 mmol/mol (−0.58±0.13%) in control group 2 (p=0.0193 vs intervention group). Adverse events occurred in 28.85% (15/52) of individuals in the intervention group, 26.42% (14/53) in control group 1 and 48.08% (25/52) in control group 2. Conclusions/interpretation: Stand-alone isCGM offers a greater reduction in HbA<subscript>1c</subscript> in adults with type 2 diabetes on MDI when education on the interpretation of graphical patterns in CGM is provided. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04926623. Funding: This study was supported by Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0012186X
Volume :
67
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Diabetologia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
177673805
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06152-1